Philosophy of Design
Kantegh scientific articles, N1 / 58 | Asoghik Publishing House, Yerevan
The modernity of the main issue and the philosophical perception of the esthetical essence of design first of all were conditioned with the growing attention and interest towards to the contemporary design. From the philosophical aspect contemporary design is such a phenomenon which includes worldwide achievements, culture and the connection its features, which express the stages of human culture, present and the orientation to future. The culture, including, design, reflects the historical development certain level of society and person, person approaching, the mental and subjective results of mental of the activity towards to the nature and society during that historical stage.
Generally the role of philosophy is to reveal and present the analysis of human society passed way and the present, to foresee the future developments, to give the scientific comment of the existence and as human cognitive methodical manifestation, it defines the approaching principles, way of thinking towards to the world.
The philosophy, as the theoretical thinking field, form, manifestation, mediated reflect to the world, events, towards to the certain approaches, by its each notion, in any care is connected with the person.
Human problem is important and key issue for philosophy and the purpose of design philosophy is to elucidate that what did it give to person and in different stages of society development and what will it give in the future?
The philosophy of design is one of the main ways which characterizes the historical periods, their ideology and mental culture. The creation of art, culture, expression means and work tools for each era is conditioned for internal necessity for that period and the historical situation, demands are reflected in it and of course also the design of that moment in a disguised way. By the above mentioned characteristic clearly is confirmed the existence of creative activity in the system of design phenomenon. Undoubtedly, it is not only the result of separate creators or creating groups, their aesthetic approaching, individual or group way of thinking, but also the reflection of that era and especially the designing approaching of people and society.
The philosophy touches upon the life through the mediated certain scientific theories and through it inner separation there are a number of sciences, which are called philosophical sciences, and the aesthetics is also among them, which connecting the aesthetic imagination about the world, it presents as certain world perception of beauty. The history of philosophical design especially is the development of science and imaginations about beauty, and the purpose and nature of that history characterized the notions about beauty. And according to which they are completely different questions that what is beauty and what interconnection does it have with the other spheres?
The using forms of work tools, ways, activity and nature felt ways created by ancient person its serve express its corporal mental development level, so design is hidden in phenomena of person felt approaching since from the moment when these needs were adopted the environment.
The history of culture and art certifies that person has designing approaching in his soul. Consciously or not consciously person dad not broken off and does not break off with beauty. Therefore it is strictly important that how “humanize” beauty, design, that is to say what they were and what they become for person? In this meaning it is interesting the characteristic of philosopher Marsilio Ficino (1433-1499) according which “… the world is look like a temple, created by a big architecture, and because of it the painter, which acts as a creator, if wants to make a real work of art, will be able to understand the beauty and harmony rights of the universe”[1].
[1] Հրվինգ Սթոուն, Միքելանջելո, Երևան, <<Սովետական գրող>>, 1978, էջ 231:
The philosophy is a form of public consciousness, which gives general imagination about world and person and from that aspect it examines the cognitive, valuable and aesthetic relations towards to the world. According which the dialectical logic requires review the object study in its development duration. People and beauty observation, as a separate phenomenon in fact is the philosophical separation from each other of these notions. The person, without beauty, is impossible to imagine, and imagine beauty without person is meaningless. So the beauty, specifically design, its idea, is the component of dialectical unity of person nature.
The philosophical nature of this dialectical unity is the fact that person and design, beauty and comfort can’t exist separately, but they also are in the dialectical unity. It is necessary to mention that design is manifested also as the expression of harmony in these relations, which is the qualitative unity of subjects and events from different sides. According to which if the external shape, form of subject, object corresponds with the content so person perceives it harmony. This formulation has strictly conditional nature as the form and content can’t exist separately. Undoubtedly no creature, apart from the person, is able to perceive and reproduce nature and its creation harmony. The nature is harmonious in itself.
Each issue about design perception is connected with the beauty and comfort correlation. If the subject of design is perceived and assessed as beauty so it expresses and it has beauty in, which philosophical assessment is perceived as beauty by person.
It is unquestionable that there are both beautiful and both ugly things in nature (by person perception, imagination). However, these perception differences are abolished when the approach towards them, the serve for their needs and their nature discover get primary meaning. In this meaning person interaction with the nature in ancient world was connected with new approaching towards to the person life and then especially during the Renaissance period, it became one of the main aspects of culture.
Person gives such a miraculous power to the things, but things, within their dialectical interconnection, return it back to person and through their specific contents features become the objective condition for person existence leaving a unique influence on him. The thing, created by the person, bears the stamp of that era, as both scientific and technical and both public relations as well as imaginations about beauty are reflected in it. The evidence of this is the fact that we can recover imagination from things, which we had from past eras, about household and public relations of that era as well as the culture.
The thing, apart from applied meaning, is the bear of sign of certain relations of public meaning and imaginations about beauty and presented as a symbol that is to say is considered the cultural value. The thing is comprehended by person, as it acquires some human imaginations by the aesthetic ideal. But when time has passed the aesthetic standard changed and the thing is morally wiped. It turns out that the things must be not only really useful, but also must correspond with the imaginations of person about beauty, that is to say the aesthetic approaching of person.
In ancient world, and then in Early Renaissance era, the artists (Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Rafayel and others) tried to create beautiful works of art by all sides, to create comfortable constructions, buildings. Already during 15-16th centuries a lot of money are spent for palaces and temples, painting and sculpture in Europe.
According to Hegel characteristic the beauty, in nature, differs from the beauty in art in the fact that the beauty in nature is subject but beauty in the art is beautiful imagination about subject. That is to say there is a substantial difference: we live parallel to the beautiful subject or we have beautiful imaginations about it and weather the beautiful subject is a masterpiece of nature or is created by person (this is the substantial difference).
It is another question that, from above, even genius artists couldn’t and can’t completely imitate to the majesty of nature. In this meaning it is important Giorgio Vasari’s assessment given to his teacher, Michelangelo: »…to a genius, who was able absolutely in all arts and your wanted handicraft only by his work show that how perfect can the painting art be, with lines and contours, light and shadow giving expressiveness to the painting subjects»[2]. Describing to his teacher like this he at the same time mentioned that his painting, sculptural, architectural works were adapted to person, even to him highest requirements, however they are not creations of nature.
[2] Джорджо Вазари. Жизнеописания, т. II, М-Л., 1933, стр. 301-302.
Still the time, the imaginations about subject, tool, work way, construction comfort, created by a person, arose in him parallel to the harmony and improvement of the creating subjective world, the tendency of these all and the artistic reorganization of the environment arose, that is to say the designing approaching.
These opinions were created still during the earliest periods of the development of the human society. The separate references and pieces or information about design and its elements were in the works of philosophers of Ancient Greece like Aristotle, Plato, Polikletes, Herodotus, Ancient Rome like Pliny the Elder, Vitruvius and others works and Armenian, Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Near East and Middle East and European sources from ancient and middle centuries. Summarizing the development of the artistic practice and the theoretical mind, especially precious mind and references about design left Leonardo da Vinci (see the tracty of “About painting”). They found their future developments in the works of numerous scientists, state, public and religious workers of medieval Renaissance era.
The greatest representative of the German Renaissance, Albrecht Durer (1471-1528), the beauty, therefore, design also compared with the aesthetic perception of the nature and with the reproductive things created by the man. Already during 17- 18th centuries, remarkable aesthetic minds expressed Frenchmen Condillac, Dyubon, Didron, Englisman Hetcheson, Hom, Borq, Germans Kant, Shelling, Hegel, Russians Belinski, Dobrolyubov and the others.
The Urartian inscriptions contained the aesthetic taste or that could be identified the different elements of design. As it is known Armenian philosophy is formed in first centuries of B.C. becoming the substantial component of Armenian spiritual culture, the worldview manifestation of national self-consciousness. Parallel to the philosophy in Armenian bibliography always is used also another term for philosophy. In the matter of development of Armenian aesthetic mind, about the creation of philosophical ideas, there were significant participation and important references and essays of that fields in the works of Agathangelos, Faustus of Byzantium, Mesrop Mashtots (exactly expressing the Armenian letters system, the creation of their final image of new invention word forms), Movses Khorenatsi (specifically in the constructional descriptions of Tigranakert, Shamiramakert, Ervandashat, Ervandakert), David the Invincible, Eznik of Kolb, Anania Shirakatsi, Grigor Narekatsi, Mkhitar Gosh, Grigor Magistros, Stepanos Taronetsi, Aristakes Lastivertsi, Hovhannes Sarkavag, Nerses Shnorhali, Samuel Anetsi, Kirakos Gandzaketsi, Stepanos Orbelian, Thomas of Metsoph, Hovhannes Vorotnetsi, Gregory of Tatev, Stepanos Lehaci and others works[3].
[3] Очерк развития эстетической мысли в Армении (под обшей научной редакцией Я. И. Хачикяна), Москва, “Искусство”, 1976, с. 12-72:
Xenophon, Strabo, Plutarch and many others left so much information and programmes, precious descriptions and characteristics about the aesthetic sides of the Armenian settlements, castles, churches and other constructions. The characteristic of R. Aghababyan is remarkable that “The invention of the Armenian alphabet significantly promoted to the keeping and the rapid development of our culture’s independence in 406. One of the outstanding branches of that culture was the organizing Armenian classic architecture”[4].
[4] Աղաբաբյան Ռ., Հայ ճարտարապետության պատմությունը // <<Սովետական արվեստ>>, Երևան, 1965, հոկտեմբեր, թիվ 10, էջ 41:
Design, already as type of applied art and the formation its theory, is conditioned with the fall of the handicraft production and organizing and development of the industrial production. The mass consumed subjects produced by the industrial way, were appeared in 18th century. The subjective environment, created by a man, stopped being only the result of handmade, the machines also started to create it. The mechanical production exceled to a vocational in many times from the productive aspect, within it new issues were appeared, the quality of the production created by a handmade in the workshops totally could be reflected and found place in each production of machinery mass production. The imaginations about the beauty and attractiveness of machines and the technical structures were forming at the beginning in 19th century and the necessity of harmony and reorganization of the subjective world arose. These main issues deepened in the end of 19th century and in the beginning of 20th century. Design bases were starting to form and comprehend, which were offered as the main directions of the artistic projecting corresponding with the production standards of that country during the first years of its being. These bases were the manifestations of person surrounding environment, subjects, things, him created production and their human meaning and concrete correlation, which already could be worth for the artistic assessment.
“Design” as a word appeared in the beginning of 20th century. “Design” word means to draw, project and scheme as well as drawing, projecting by which are mentioned new ways of projecting of the subjective world. This word comes from “design” in English and first of all supposes the artistic projecting, however at the same time includes the process of useful and beauty[5].
[5] Романычевa Э.Т., Яцюк О.Г. дизайн и реклама // Компьютерные технологии: справочное и практическое руководство. Москва, ДМК Пресс, 2002, стр. 18.
In the most generalized way “design” notion could describe as high consumption features and industrial product having aesthetic qualities, the subjective environment surrounding the man, productive, household and social-cultural field formatting projecting, the artistic and technical activity, which nature and development level was linked with the different approaching of aesthetic perception of the subjective environment surrounding the man in that era and its development state and level. And as has mentioned M. Mikayelyan: “… we must not forget that every stone, which is put today, tomorrow will sound and read by tomorrow’s eye. So let it put in a way that apart from satisfying the material-cultural demands of the next generations, be correspond to their taste, be one of the necessary aesthetic elements of the future life”[6].
[6] Միքայելյան Մ., Տիպարային նախագիծը և մեր քաղաքների կառուցապատման էսթետիկան // <<Սովետական արվեստ>>, Երևան, 1960, մարտ, թիվ 3, էջ 25:
The regularities of design development, the principles and ways of the artistic projecting, the public nature and meaning, study the technical aesthetics, which is the system of social, cultural, technical and the aesthetic main issues forming harmonious subjective environment created through industrial production for person life and activity. It totally includes the general theory of design, which presents its social essence, causing necessity and conditions, development duration and history, present state and development perspectives. At the same time design reflects the mutual connection of technique, culture, especially the art, the aesthetic questions of the subjective environment. It defines the aesthetic requirements of producing production, person surrounding and the subjective environment created by person, assessment ways of technical standards, formatting principles of the harmonious subjective world and requirements and peculiarities of the artistic projecting. In this meaning it is necessary to mention that during 1960-80s, as has mentioned the doctor of arts, professor, Ararat Aghasyan that already in Armenia “… in the aspect of architectural volumes and surfaces and the artistic decoration, decorative- rhythmic and the arqitektonik emphasis with sculpture, have actively started to be included monumental-decorative various forms of painting and the specific point of views like fresco, mosaic, stained glass as well”[7].
[7] Աղասյան Ա., Հայ կերպարվեստի զարգացման ուղիները XIX-XX դարերում, Երևան, <<Ոսկան Երևանցի>>, 2009, էջ 155։
According to Valter Gropius design creates ‘’the visible specific language” which gives visible expression to ideas. The proportionalities, imaginations, visible (optics) illusion, color, the relations of light and shadow, emptiness and subjects volumes, color and harmony become the signs in the “visible language” of design. The penetration of the aesthetic pre- beginning in the industry gradually includes all spheres. The close unification of the utilitarian and the aesthetic preference happens in the industry. The utilitarian searches of the form usefulness and the creating subjects are combined with its expressiveness and beauty creatures.
Generally approaches and processes towards to the person surrounding environment, its components, production formation is the key part of the artistic projecting, which are connected with type of industrial product, form, using material, prepare technology and meaning. “…decorative art includes almost all sides of life since from external formatting of cities, streets, public buildings and flats up to clothing modeling”[8].
[8] Այվազյան Մ., Դեկորատիվ֊-կիրառական արվեստի մի քանի հարցեր // <<Սեվետական արվեստ>>, Երևան,1965, հուլիս, թիվ 7, էջ 38։
Design develops approaches and typical examples in order to organize difficult environment of that society activity. Today no branch of the industry can be managed without design. Design, in some meaning, is the pledge of the extended of the sphere of the applied art and its development.
Design confirms a specific connection between spiritual and material cultures. This is a link between them and the crossed focus. By this it secured the cultural totality of the contemporary civilization. It reflects the scientific and technical level of that society, the technological result of the production. Design is the cooperation between the planner and painter, producer and consumer, by which result its utilitarian and aesthetic qualities, are appreciated. “Today the main problem of design is to serve subjective world to the man, with its diverse and complicated interrelations”[9]. In other way design is mass cultural communication inner of the society, which unites to the persons as by the stylistics of consumption joint productive-aesthetic subjects as by the imaginations towards to the lifestyle. The study of design social essence, its conditions, the historical bases, present state and development perspectives and the creative thinking influenced on them, regularities and peculiarities of approaches facts that it was called to collect also the spiritual and material, humanitarian and scientific and technical spheres and improvements of the national culture, historical tendency of surrounding environment and production and style change generally in the world and specifically in that country.
[9] Հայկական դիզայն, գործեր, հոգսեր // << Սովետական արվեստ>>, Երևան, 1977, թիվ 12, էջ 15, (Լրագրող Է. Դանեղյան և դիզայներ Ա. Մելիքյանի Երկխոսությունը, Մ.Լ.):
Studying the artistic and applied nature of Armenian design from the side of industrial, cultural, scientific and technical, analyzing its formatting and public duration, presenting the artistic, technological and technical main issues of Armenian design it is obvious that its methodological base also includes approaches and principles of the artistic and theoretical-artistic concerning with the historical- public and the artistic development of the national art.
Parallel with the different directions and types of art and culture, design, being one of the main standards of the public culture and that time and one type of mass form of the applied art, being the direct result of person activity, as a new and previously never commented branch of science and art, was comprehended perceptibly in a short time. Only during one-two generational period a new professional orientation activity was confirmed, which was necessary to comprehend in a way, and all the more, substantiated its right, requirement, reasons and necessity as a separate, new professional independent existence.
Coming from the necessity of revealing the artistic and historical-cultural nature of design, and the requirements of the contemporaneity and from the tendency to satisfy these requirements, numerous scientists-art critics, designers, philosophers touched upon design and its manifestations and role in the newest art in a short time. Later, studying design from a new aspect, they started to touch upon the projecting process of designing subjective world, the things created by its result, its beauty and comfort, flexible peculiarities of the aesthetic and applied sides. Then designers were in the center of the studies. The art critic-researchers gradually had starting to show interest towards to the activity of designers, working way and styling the principles, designing specific solutions and to the question that how did these solutions differ from the engineering solutions[10].
[10] Աղասյան Ա., Հայ կերպարվեստի զարգացման ուղիները XIX-XX դարերոմ, Երևան, << Ոսկսն Երևանցի>>, 2009; Гвишиани Д.М. Наука, дизайн, будушее// Техническая эстетика, Москва, 1970, № 1,с.1-3; Глазычев В.Л. О дизайне. Очерки по теории и практике дизайна на Западе. Москва, Искусство, 1970, Курьерова Г. Г. феномен и дизайн- образования в Италии // Труды ВНИИТЭ, выпуск 50. Москва, ВНИИТЭ, 1986, стр. 29-44. Huisman D., Patrix G. L’ésthétique industrielle. Paris, Presses universitares de France, 1961.
Undoubtedly, imaginations about profitability and beauty had changed, but it was not sufficient base for assessment, as the system of imagination is always going to change. Certain strategy of design was formed in the field of mass production of contemporary industry. Due to the works of theorists and practical specialists that strategy not only secured its stable place in the perceive system of industrial production and scientific studies during decades, but also reached to the fact that design, as a type of art and science, perceived in a proper way, and the designing works, as the spiritual and material cultural values, assessed and recognized properly.
Design must strive to maximum correspond the mass and special use production with the requirements of the consumer, secure the aesthetic high quality of industrial product, correspondent with the mass actual imaginations about beauty, will be able to analyze the demand, make and present projects, creative solutions and guide them to the industrial implementation. In this meaning it is appreciate to cite the speeches of the president of USA, George Bush: “Design is an inseparable part of American life…Design gives an opportunity to a person to live more strong and an effective life”[11].
[11] Բաղդասարյան Լ. Վաղը չէ մյուս օրը մտնելու ենք XXI դար // <<Արվեստ>>, Երևան, 1991, թիվ 5-6, էջ 46։
The general image of design makes it more complete the circumstance that design is not only in the field of market and consumer, but also in the sphere of culture. However, this identification gives an opportunity to include deign in the system developed by the art-criticism and tries to reveal unknown sides through the known. That peculiarity of design has clearly expressed Tomas Maldonado. And as characterize G. Nelson: “Different philosophies of design expresses different attitude towards to the world. The place, which we give for design in the world, depends on the fact that how do we understand this world…”[12].
[12] Nelson G. The problems of design. New York, Whitney publications, 1957, p. 33.
About the cultural achievements of Armenian people during a thousand years, which reflect the design of that time, fact many historical constant values including, city planning, architecture, church building, engineering mind, national clothing, sculpture, fresco, bibliography, graphics, painting, miniature painting and many other spheres. They present the historical destiny of people such as origin, passed way, struggle and achievements.
Design, being one of the most important spheres of national culture, was always linked with the aesthetic mind development of that era. And it should be taken into consideration that painting and other creative directions and design, as well as their elements, could not formed and developed out of that aesthetic systems. For such a kind of high level corresponding environment and surrounding was necessary as in the own country as in some political trading connection countries.
The study of Armenian design during 1960-80s gave an opportunity to see that its theoretical direction, having significant independent, in some way influenced on the formation of designer’s ideology. The artistic projecting in public environment vitally promoted to the transformation of the subjective world, the creation of comprehensive, harmonious, favorable conditions for person development.
Therefore, as in the cultural and aesthetic whole system, as in design, successes were a lot when the artistic mind was measured with already known problems, which was always connected with the aesthetic development of each era including the essence of design of that period.
The development of the artistic mind starts not only from the transfer of the accumulated experience and cognition, but also from the sensitive approaches of world perception reproduction, philosophical analyses, which, by their turn, are the base for innovation and creative process. In this case design is not only the reproduction of the past, but also the expression of present, contemporary aesthetics and art taste.
LILIT MELIKYAN
